Platform
The operating layer for source-aware investment work.
MindLab sits between your source materials and your outputs, preserving sources, reviewer decisions, and approved context so every workflow leaves behind more than it consumes.
Discuss implementation fitCompany Record
Evidence coverage
Live Review Queue
2026 ARR bridge
Partner review required
Implementation wedge
Approved with 5 sources
Rejected RPM comparable
Merged into record
Deal intake
Decks, CIMs, models, call notes, updates, memos, and public context enter one private workspace with source links intact.
Live company records
Each company accumulates risks, questions, source maps, reviewer notes, approved assumptions, and decision history.
Review-ready outputs
MindLab prepares first reads, diligence notes, memo sections, meeting briefs, monitoring updates, and advisor responses.
Human approval gates
Humans decide what is final, what gets saved, and what can be shared externally.
How It Works
Source material enters, review happens, the record persists.
MindLab processes source materials into first reads, flags what needs human review, and saves what the team approves as reusable company context.
Source Review
Inputs
Series B deck
1818 deal claims linked
Model v12
FlagRevenue bridge reconciled
Partner notes
44 objections preserved
Review Workspace
Draft claim
Expansion depends on reducing clinical onboarding time below 21 days.
Supported
Deck p.14, call note 05
Needs Review
Cohort data requested
Reviewer edits decide what gets saved, what stays draft, and what gets blocked.
Approved Record
Partner-approved thesis
Enterprise clinical teams show stronger pull than SMB practices.
Open diligence question
Validate churn assumptions in hospital expansion cohort.
Comparable pattern
Similar buyer-risk pattern seen in rejected RPM review.
Design Principles
Three decisions that shape every feature.
Source discipline
Every claim stays linked to its source. Gaps, conflicts, and weak evidence are surfaced before review.
Reviewer authority
AI output is draft until a human reviews, edits, approves, or rejects it. Reviewers control what becomes firm record.
Durable memory
Approved work persists as reusable company context. The next analyst, memo, meeting, or response starts from what the firm already inspected.
Workflow Coverage
One evidence base. Every investment workflow your team repeats.
Diligence support
Prepare first reads, risks, missing-information lists, and question packs from the source set.
IC memo prep
Draft memo sections with source-linked claims, reviewer flags, and open questions for partners.
Portfolio monitoring
Compare new updates against the firm's last approved assumptions and flagged risks.
Meeting prep
Generate meeting briefs from the company record, open questions, and new materials.
Company records
Preserve approved assumptions, decisions, source trails, and reviewer history per company.
Advisor responses
Answer external questions from approved facts while internal notes stay blocked.
Trust Console
Internal workspace
Full source room, notes, partner debate
Internal only
Approved records
Saved decisions and reviewer notes
Approval gate
External advisor
Approved facts only
Restricted answer
Unsupported claim
No source or weak evidence
Blocked
Current external response
12 approved facts available. Internal notes, valuation debate, and partner comments blocked.
Private Briefing
Decision agenda
Briefing Packet
Workflow candidate
IC memo risk section from real materials
Trust boundary
Internal notes blocked from external output
Pilot evidence
Source flags, reviewer edits, approved records
Next Step
See MindLab on one real workflow.
We will identify the workflow, source materials, review standards, and durable context before requesting broad confidential sharing.